bloodyrosemccoy: (Sisters)
My sister is here! Hooray!

Dang, I love it when she visits. Who else can I go from discussing the publishing industry to gleefully squealing at a Let's Play of Five Nights at Freddy's* to contemplating the attributes of fairy jail in the Disney Fairyverse** with?

It's good to have people who get me.


*If you haven't seen it, I warn you that even with Markiplier's delightful self-comfort chatter in that video, that video and the game itself is fucking TERRIFYING. I haven't had so much fun watching most actual horror MOVIES as I have watching that LP.

**Have I mentioned that I LOVE the Disney Fairies? Especially the movie versions. For one thing, Peter Pan has been thoroughly bussed from the movies (I think it's technically before Tinker Bell meets him, which I'm fine with), and Tink has a much more likable personality. More importantly, though, they're girly as unicorns in a meadow full of rainbow glitter, and yet Tinker Bell is also an ENGINEER. You can totally be a girly mechanical engineer! The Fairies say so, god dammit! (And the latest movie, The Pirate Fairy, has a SCIENCE FAIRY who does experiments and alchemy and stuff! IT'S GREAT.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Deep Thoughts)
So I (FINALLY!) watched The LEGO Movie last night. Loved it. And I gotta say, you know how there's all this pearl-clutching* about how the very end joke is HORRIBLY SEXIST? I wonder how many of those people actually have younger siblings. Because I'm a big sister, and let me tell you, that ending KILLED me. Plus, it offered spoilers, and aren't I nice cutting these? )

If I were to point out any sexist problems with this movie, it'd be the bizarrely common trope wherein no matter how incredibly talented, hardworking, and all-around qualified a female character is, she'll always be eclipsed by some talentless doofus who is supposed to be indefinably Special.** Yeah, I know part of the movie's message is that everyone is special, but come on, maybe we can give shout-outs to actual hard work and skill for a change? Let's retire that particular plot device. Both in movies and in real life, if possible.

Don't get me wrong, that didn't ruin the movie for me. It was just the soap-flavored cilantro in this movie's otherwise delicious pico de gallo. I need to watch it about 20 more times just to see what all is going on in those action scenes.


FAVORITE LINE: "Do you think zeppelins are a bad investment?"

FAVORITE VISUAL GAG: President Lord Business's evil flowing necktie cape.


*Inaccurate pearl-clutching, at that--I believe Unikitty was SPOILER ) and furthermore, ALSO A SPOILER ).

**Seriously, FUCK YOU, Kung Fu Panda.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Peach)
I've mostly been quiet on the way the internet is eating itself over this whole Guy Says He Hates Women, Shoots Up Women, And Then We Have To Convince People That Misogyny Might Be A Problem thing, because I felt I had nothing useful to add. But then [livejournal.com profile] gwalla pointed me to this excellent article, which makes a lot of good points. I'm not going to go over what he's saying because, y'know, he already wrote the article, but there is one small, stupid, petty thing right in the title that I realized has bothered me for years, which is a tiny symptom of the whole big mess, and as long as we're confessing things I want to get it off my chest.

Why the hell does everyone imply that Mario is saving the princess solely so that he can bang her?

Look, I get it. This is the internet. Rule 34, off-color jokes, Grimdark Mario, I-Can't-Unsee-It searches on DeviantArt. But here's the thing: I grew up with Mario. I was introduced to him as a kid--hell, Super Mario Bros. came out the same year I did. And while he doesn't talk much, he's got a pretty definite personality and characterization. And part of that characterization is that he is a Good Guy. Not a Nice Guy--I'm not talking about the term that disparages the very disparageable group of dudes mentioned in the above article. He's not just WAITING for the princess to notice how great he is. He is a fucking GOOD GUY. He is thrown into this world that has just been taken over by hostile dragons; the princess has been kidnapped and her subjects are suffering. This is bad.

So he goes to save her. Not because she's hot and he might get see her naked, but just because it's the right thing to do. Hell, he probably isn't even doing it for the completely nonmetaphorical and quite literal cake. He's doing it because somebody's gotta save the kingdom.*

So call me silly, but he's always been kind of my hero for that.

And so it pains me to think that something I saw as heroic--yes, it's a silly story, but it's still heroic--read to other people as doing something with a selfish ulterior motive.

I guess it's because we often project aspects of ourselves onto characters, and it's annoying when you're projecting the unselfish motives onto a character and somebody else projects a baser image. And because I rather like rescue narratives but get frustrated by how often the rescuee is considered a prize rather than a person being, y'know, RESCUED. I'd like to disentangle those two ideals. And for me, starting this game as a naive little kid, Mario was a good place to start.


BONUS THOUGHTS: It occurs to me that I also have an image of Princess Peach that is slightly skewed from the normal perception of her as a Dumbass In Distress, due largely to a couple of factors. One, of course, is the greatest game in the world, Super Mario RPG, wherein she DOES start out as a Dumbass In Distress but then joins your party to wallop everyone with parasols and frying pans. The other is the Super Mario Adventures comic by Kentaro Takekuma (the one that ran in Nintendo Power back in the day). If you can track this comic down, DO IT. It is weird and funny and colorful and action-packed, and also possibly where the Marioverse's obsession with cake started, and more to the point Princess Peach/Toadstool is kind of a badass in it. She does get captured--while LEADING AN ARMY to battle Bowser. And she winds up ninja-ing her way out of prison, dressing as Luigi to rescue Mario (don't ask), and obliterating Wendy O. Koopa's tower in the process. Also, she's the one who uses the cape power-up. It ... may have colored my perception of her a bit.


*And also because he seems to be having a really good time despite the peril. You probably know my alternate theory, which actually seems to fit the whole franchise's tone better, is that Bowser, at least, and possibly everyone else, thinks that the princess-saving obstacle courses are just another form of weekend recreation with his buddies, like the tennis and golf and go-kart racing they do on other weekends. One weekend they're at the racetrack; the next one the game is Capture-The-Princess. Bowser isn't so much a villain as he is a game designer. I strongly suspect Mario enjoys these weekends, too. And Peach never seems particularly put out by them, either. Maybe they all just think it's a super-fun elaborate game.

(Also, when Mario stomps on Goombas or whatever they don't die, they just teleport to the Goomba-Reinflation Center. That's why Bowser doesn't just flatten Mario by sending a hundred thousand Goombas at him at once. There are only about 50-100 Goombas total in the Koopa Kingdom. I HAVE THOUGHT THIS THROUGH.)
bloodyrosemccoy: (Pirate Key)
A few months ago I decided to try menstrual cups again.

So You Know Where I'm Going With This Cut. )
bloodyrosemccoy: (Optimus)
Y'all might think we Salt Lakers are weird, but we ain't got NOTHING on our slightly-to-the-south neighbor Provo and its BYU Bubble.* Sure, here in SLC we do get Disapproving Mormons who will frown at your immodest tank top, and a lot of them do insist that the onus is on the woman to keep men from thinking Impure Thoughts,** but the concern troll notes aren't quite such a big deal.

I shouldn't have read the comments, though. Highlights include:

-The original author of the post going "Dude, I wrote this like FIVE MONTHS AGO, what is even happening"
-A lot of helpful comments along the lines of "But my dear that is a VERY IMMODEST SHIRT do you want the boys to THINK ILL OF YOU?" when it's like an ordinary T-shirt.***
-Creeps, creeping on her
-My absolute favorite in terms of wrongness, in which a lady sanctimoniously declares that "my innocent 10-year-old son told me that the layers shirt I was lounging around the house in was making him uncomfortable; did I bite his head off about being a pervert or shame him into leaving the room? No; I changed my shirt because I love him and I didn’t want him to be uncomfortable" like that makes her really nice and considerate when all I can think is, How the HELL did this 10-year-old boy become an obsessive prude? and suddenly the whole anecdote gets really creepy.

God, I live in a weird neighborhood. At least I'm just on the outskirts.


*A lot of great artists and authors go/went to Brigham Young University, and while a lot of them are cool, somehow I can always tell just by the art and writing whether it's a BYU person. There's some intangible flavor there that's tough to explain to outsiders.

**Were I a dude, I would frankly be insulted by the constant implication that I was completely incapable of restraining myself around women I found attractive. The argument that they are helpless victims of women's wiles has always baffled me for that reason.

***Not that even smaller shirts would be worthy of notes like that, but it does go to show how hypersensitive people can get about things like this.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Xenofairies)
I actually hate the term "selfie," purely for aesthetic reasons. It just sounds dumb, y'know? But as far as being put into the OED, I really don't see any reason to object.

The only possible reason I can think of for objecting, actually, is the idea that since it's a newly-added word, the selfie must be a new concept. You get all sorts of people hollering about how this just goes to show how narcissistic we all are nowadays, or that it's a sign of tragic insecurity. (Or, somehow, both at the same time, which is impressive.)

I hereby want to point out that this is total bullshit.

The strange thing is, the Narcissism and the Attention Whore arguments seem to be exclusively used as arguments against social media. "Nobody wants to hear about what you had for lunch!" I hear. "Nobody cares what you're doing right now!" Which, aside from being totally untrue--I, for one, love hearing/reading the everyday thoughts that wander through people's brains--is exactly the opposite of what a whole lot of frustrated grownups kept trying to grind into my asocial possibly-spectrumy little head when I was an uncommunicative kid who had no idea why I was supposed to listen to other kids talking about whatever stupid shit they were interested in. Why am I supposed to show interest in conversation about What I Did This Morning in person, but when I'm online I'm supposed to just scoff at the same thing?

Social media is just conversation, chatting, socializing, and small talk in a different medium.

Same goes for selfies--it seems to be their existence on the internet that infuriates people.* It's on the internet! Therefore this interest in looking at oneself must be NEW!

To which I say, check this out.

That right there is a link to an interesting study done on those weirdly disproportionate, bizarrely lumpy Upper-Paleolithic Venus figurines. The theory the author, LeRoy McDermott, is putting forward is that their strange proportions make total sense when you assume that they are self-portraits, done by women who don't have access to mirrors--when viewed at the same angles as you might use to look down at yourself, they do fit the proportions.

So according to that theory, some of the oldest art in the world is SELFIES.

It makes me regard the argument that selfies are a product of this latest generation of degenerate self-obsessed narcissists with a little bit of skepticism.

Honestly, I just think that selfies are the latest expression of a very old human fascination with themselves. It's not necessarily narcissism. It's just that, dang, y'all, here we are, we are humans, we're on this Earth, and look at us! We're doing things! And we can watch ourselves doing things, and remember those things we did, and analyze them, and philosophize about them! It's INTERESTING, dangit! It is one of the things that humans just do, because dude, we're humans!

Of course, another thing that humans seem to do with a lot of enthusiasm is bitch about how language is changing, so I suppose I can't be too hard on the people lamenting the new words. After all, the author of one of those articles I linked to above sarcastically pointed out that the OED is "the publisher of the venerable record of the language of Shakespeare and George Orwell," and yet seemed completely unaware of the irony of citing two authors separated by radically different eras of English as an example of why changes to the language now are to be lamented. Consistency has never been our strong suit, anyway.

And speaking of which, I'd better end this article. I've defended the selfie as best I can, but dammit I still hate that word. I hereby am done using it.

 photo LittleSelfie_zpse072bfaa.jpg
That's right, y'all! Mirror Amelia and her Buford T-shirt endorse the selfie! OKAY NOW I AM DONE USING IT.


*And that they are often done by GIRLS, who have all sorts of standards to live up to, set both by The Patriarchy and, dare I say it, from the asshole breed of feminists who have very set ideas about what Girl Power has to be.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Deep Thoughts)
I harbor a lot of resentment for Peter Pan.

It’s not an out-and-out hatred. I mean, I was willing to see the Disney movie, and the movie version of Mary Martin as Mr. B Natural as Peter Pan, and I read the book version that my aunt had around the house, and I wasn't exactly furiously chucking the book across the room or anything. But I did always leave feeling ... rather put off.*

It took me a long time to articulate why. There were a lot of reasons. For one, Neverland seemed to be made up of a bunch of random elements that JM Barrie vaguely remembered finding appealing as a kid--the old-timey equivalent of something that nowadays would cram robots, aliens, superheroes, princesses, ponies, zombies, ninjas, and okay yeah pirates into a world without any logic or reason.** It was clearly a nostalgia’s-eye view of pretend time, and it was grating.

For another, Peter Pan was a schmuck. I could never tell if he was supposed to be endearingly self-centered and egomaniacal--like kids can be--or if it was meant as a slightly darker commentary on those same characteristics.*** No matter what, though, he seemed far too self-centered. Kids aren’t all that one-note shitty.

But mostly, it was the ladies.

I could not stand the female characters in Neverland. They were all written with such malice. Their automatic hostility toward Wendy was inexplicable and pointless--especially if it really was centered around the fact that they all wanted Peter’s attention, because the hell with him. Not a single character was likable, but the females got some extra attention paid to detailing their unlikability. And Wendy herself was an obnoxious load--whiny, helpless, codependent, and prone to forget that, you know, SHE COULD FUCKING FLY.

Which is still true in most adaptations. I stand by the fact that Wendy is a terrible character as originally written. However, I tend to run all the permutations of her together, so I missed something kind of excellent about Disney Wendy until my brother pointed it out: unlike with the other Wendys, Disney Wendy’s main character arc is the dawning realization that Neverland is bullshit.

And my brother is right.

When you watch it with that in mind, it's actually pretty great. In the beginning of the movie Wendy’s all for going to Neverland, and she’s clearly crushing on Peter. And then every single experience she has is a miserable disappointment. Woo, mermaids! Oh, hang on, mermaids are bratty and cliqueish. Woo, fairies! Oh, wait, they’re bratty too. Woo, Lost Boys! Holy shit never mind they just straight up tried to murder me. Woo, Indians! Oh GOD they are racist stereotypes and also they won’t let me join the party but keep making me gather firewood. Woo, pirates! Oh, right, they’re FUCKING PIRATES. Woo, Peter Pan! Oh, wait, this kid is a god damn SOCIOPATH. Everyone else acts stupid and childish, and finally she just can’t TAKE it anymore. So when she goes back to the real world--with, might I add, no implication that she’s gonna be trapped in some stupid one-sided relationship where Peter flies back to collect her for “spring cleaning” each year—she’s pretty much like “GET ME THE HELL OUT OF THIS NURSERY; I AM SO READY TO BE A GROWNUP.”

And suddenly the reason I still had a soft spot for Disney Wendy (well, that and the fact that I’m in love with Kathryn Beaumont’s voice work) was clear to me.

So yes, I still very much dislike Peter Pan. But it’s rather heartening to realize that Disney Wendy feels kind of the same way.


*Especially by the Mr. B Natural one, because I know stage rules are different, but man, they weren’t even TRYING to make the illusion work.

**I’m not saying these things can’t be awesome together, but you’ve got to WORK on it.

***Yes, I know they touched on that in the more recent live action movie, but it still didn’t quite fully grasp it.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Bookstore Belle)
Here's an entertaining experiment: Maureen Johnson asked her Twitter followers to reimagine book covers after swapping the authors' genders. Some of them are painfully funny.

Of course, this just brings home to me that most book covers, aside from being gendered as FUCK, are also terrible. I remember getting fairly grumpy as I shelved books at the library: all the male authors got Jackson Pollock ink splats, and the female authors got random fruit, random flowers, or, for some reason, feet. And then of course there's the Angsty YA: dudes get monochromatic silhouettes, and the ladies get monochromatic greyscale soft-focus girls looking thoughtfully away, possibly at the wind machine that seems to be blowing their hair all over the place.

But then, y'all know my take on covers. I like covers that are splashy and pretty and brightly colored and goddamn LITERAL. Like these Alanna covers. Or any of these. That's the kind of book cover that makes me want to read the contents. I'm not so sure I'd want to read any of the books with whatever the hell is going on here.*

Probably this goes along with the simple principle that if you really CAN'T squeeze an exciting and dynamic scene out of your book to put on the cover, I probably don't want to read it. If your cover has someone chucking a spear at a dragon, or flying a spaceship over a mysterious planet, I get pretty interested pretty fast. If, on the other hand, your cover has, say, a pair of shoes and some doodles on it, I will assume your character's head is so far up her own ass that she never manages to accomplish anything interesting at all. The problem, as illustrated above, is when the books that DO have awesome scenes get stuck with shoes or mooning teenagers. Why the hell would you even PUT that on there when you could have somebody do a Drew Struzan-like splash of awesome?

Listen, publishers: unless your book is a picture book, I get exactly ONE illustration per volume. MAKE IT A GOOD ONE.


*I know I've used this comparison before, but I don't care because it's still a perfect one.

GAH

Oct. 29th, 2012 11:33 am
bloodyrosemccoy: (Hannelore)
I haven't linked to Scalzi's painful but brilliant post yet because I always assume that everybody on the entire internet reads Scalzi anyway, but today I decided I ought to boost the signal for anyone who missed it. (A warning: the piece is GROSS. It is very, very effective, but you may not want to read it--and if you do, you might need a shower afterward. That is perfectly all right, unless you're one of those conservative politicians, in which case it should be played on a constant audiotape loop at you.)

Plus, it's a nice segue into this. I've been kicking around the idea of satirizing the whole abortion debate using xenomorphs--something about a panel of xenomorph queens blocking a guy from getting the nice simple chestbursterectomy procedure before he explodes into blood and acid, and maybe that same panel of ALIEN QUEENS discussing why inoculations against alien fetuses should not be covered by insurance--but I haven't been able to pull it together. Fortunately, somebody else did it far more pithily than I could have. Sometimes Something Awful hits it right on.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Default)
A day late, but gimme a break—yesterday was as bonkers as Monday. Anyway, here’s …

What I Learned Since The Winter Solstice
  • Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds had lupus.
  • In other WTF music deaths, Melvin Franklin, the awesome bass singer from my favorite band, died of necrotizing fasciitis—the FLESH-EATING VIRUS.
  • The platypus’s bill is electrosensitive.
  • Quinoa comes in all the colors!
  • Friendship bracelets work on the same knot-tying principles as macramé, except for some reason they’re a lot more fun.
  • Gliese 436b is an ice planet with a surface temperature of 800˚F. Yes, that means it’s a planet of hot ice.
  • Gallbladder surgery can be avoided with magic purple stuff!
  • If you watch enough of them, it’s possible to date old western movies to within three years of their release.
  • Scientists have spliced spider genes into goats, making spidergoats whose milk can be processed into spider silk. And the spiders aren’t even radioactive.
  • Even turning into a skid won’t always save your car from blunt force trauma.
  • Wearing a seatbelt can save you from a lot of injury, but it may give you a purple boob if your car has a front-end impact.
  • There are three timelines in the Zelda universe, splitting with Ocarina of Time. In one, Ganon got the Triforce and was defeated by grown-ass Link. In another, little Link tipped everyone off to Ganon’s shenanigans (shenaniganons?) and Ganon didn’t get to become the King of Evil. In the third, Link failed and the sages had to seal Ganon into the Sacred Realm.
  • The receptionist from Monsters, Inc. has a MEAN older brother.
  • The brain-eating amoebas are IN YOUR TAPWATER RIGHT NOW. RUN.
  • Contadina sauce is the best for pizza.
  • Writing a synopsis for your own book is never easy.
  • Bomber jackets can be amazingly warm.
  • People seriously believe that monitoring the state of my reproductive system is a serious job requiring lots of government resources.
  • THERE IS A SPACE OPERA VERSION OF THE HOBBIT.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Optimus)
In other news, I just swallowed one of the birth control pills I’ve been on since age 14. It’s called polycystic ovary syndrome, a hormone condition that messes with my metabolism and blood sugar, makes my body hair into goddamn kudzu,* causes periods that look like Steve Buscemi at the end of Fargo, and—believe it or not—gives me lots of cysts on my ovaries.

So, my fine politicians, quite apart from how my sex life is none of your damn business, I need that god damn Pill. I would rather not have something I depend on for health purposes become the latest iteration of your pissing contest, thanks.


*In the right light, I appear to have a pencil-thin mustache. Sexy!
bloodyrosemccoy: (Word)
And this right here sums up my hatred of pretty much every Anne Hathaway movie ever made. (Only Marigold did forget the all-important switch from glasses to contact lenses.)

Well, except Ella Enchanted. My hatred for that Anne Hathaway movie is summed up in Answer 11 here. BUT OTHER THAN THAT.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Midna)
Been rereading the Tortall books after the new short story collection came out. I still think a Tortall adventure game would be excellent. Shit, can you imagine playing a game as Alanna, doing magic and fighting immortals and bandits and collecting mystical crysticals? I mean, it's like a perfect gaming world with an actually strong female protagonist,* just waiting to be coded. God damn, I would play that fucker till my thumbs fell off. Hell, I would buy and learn how to drive a Non!tendo console just to play it.**

I say we start a campaign. Anybody with me?


*As opposed to the kind of "strong female protagonist" that appears to be a babe with huge boobs and a sword/gun. For some reason game designers seem to prefer that one.

**I have never been good at consoles that aren’t Nintendo. Brand loyalty, I haz it.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Old Spice Onna Horse)
Hey there! Are you a prepubescent girl wondering about the strange and confusing changes you’re going through? Do you need the most useless, incomplete, and patronizing advice possible? Well, look no further: the 1950’s is there for you. For example, did you know you get chills and catch cold if you go swimming the first couple of days of your period?

Other highlights: completely pointless drawing of the left hip as part of the lesson, an ‘ukulele, the assertion that it’s more important than ever to look your best on your period,* Giant Death Pads and The Contraption They Hook Up To, and the creepiest single line ever delivered by a 50's educational film dad. Dude, that is a high bar.

Also, I’m assuming they’re all human, but every single person in this film acts strangely enough that they sail into Uncanny Valley.

I want to say, it's not actually as terrible as it could be for one of these shorts. At least you get the basics.

And yes, I found this because the Rifftrax dudes took on this short, which was howlingly funny even though they did skip the actual sex ed lesson. Buncha prudes.


*That’s not even anathema to my own thinking. That’s just inexplicable.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Angry Dome)
And just to let y’all know … yes, I do know about my state’s fucking stupid misogyny bill.

I haven’t mentioned it because, first off, I tend to take Utah’s awful policies for granted. Living here is like living with your senile racist grandpa. After a while the bullshit gets so unremarkable that you don’t feel the need to comment every damn time.

And secondly, it really speaks for itself; I can’t add much onto it.

But I realized that it may not have gotten around, and it’s phenomenal enough that maybe I should let y’all know, because even for Utah that’s a lot of horse shit. I wish you a lot of luck with the angry letters.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Fangirling)
The Case of the Missing Marquess: An Enola Holmes Mystery by Nancy Springer

Enola Holmes is awesome.

Okay, it’s no secret that I love the hell out of Sherlock Holmes. And while I am not dogmatic about what is canon and what is not, my love for the original stories means I will watch your attempts at reinterpreting Holmes with a fearsome look of cool appraisal in my eyes. Usually I will deem it unworthy and simply delete it from my mind.

But sometimes I’ll find something I like, and this time around that is Enola Holmes.

Nancy Springer’s portrayal of the younger sister (by at least two decades) of Sherlock and Mycroft is everything you’d ask of a Holmes. Enola’s intelligent, independent, multi-talented, and resourceful. And best of all, she does this all within the labyrinthine confines of Victorian England etiquette—a twist that earned Springer my undying respect.

This isn’t your average story of a 21st-Century tomboy displaced; this is historically accurate portrayal of a Victorian Suffragist, giving you everything from the writings by Mary Wollstonecraft to Enola’s mother’s preference to wear “rationals.” She also makes certain not to let Sherlock Holmes’s awesomeness eclipse his flaws—dude’s as dismissive of women in this story as he is in the originals. But this isn’t really his story—Enola does not barge into his canon and start mucking around, another thing I respect, so what we get is the story from one of the women he dismisses.

Enola’s resourcefulness draws heavily upon the ninjalike ability of women from that era to get around the social mores and ridiculous rules. She uses the language of flowers to communicate with her mother, and can read messages coded in the placement of postage stamps, of fans, and even of undergarments. She would never part with her corset—while she refuses to tighten it, it’s a perfect place to hide a dagger, serves as armor against others’ daggers, as well as having many other uses she points out through the story. It’s the details that get me—I go absolutely wild with glee when she turns something to her advantage.

And the story is good, too—putting Enola on the run from Sherlock (if he finds her, she is legally bound to follow the orders of her elder brother Mycroft, who wants to send her to boarding school) pits her wits against the world’s greatest detective—whom she idolizes. And she’s a terrific match—anyone who uses Holmes’s own failure to account for intelligent women to outsmart him wins extra super bonus points with me.

Oh, and it’s listed as juvenile fiction, but I want to make this clear—Springer doesn’t stop for slow readers. You’re expected to keep up with the references and the language, which is another way to earn my undying respect. She does hit you over the head a bit with the ciphers (YES, WE GET IT, IT'S "ALONE" SPELLED BACKWARDS), but for the most part she refuses to hold your hand. It's GREAT.

In conclusion, I loved the goddamn hell out of this book, and I’m looking forward to the rest of the series. I know not all Holmes fans will like the same thing, but if you’re into Sherlock, give this a shot.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Kiss Leia's Ass)
This made me cry tears of sympathy. It must be so sad not to be able to enjoy a genre secure in the knowledge that it’s excluding other people.

And you know, the anonymous yelling douchebag at the comically overcompensatory magazine* has a point. Here I was all set to write my next sci-fi book about a badass superpowered commando character with a gonzo streak who rescues people from crazy terrorists and then delivers explody justice to them along with her team of commandos,** but now I realize that what I actually wanted to do with the character was make her ride a sparkly space unicorn and shoot magical stars and rainbows from her wand that turn all straight men gay and render them unable to “do things” (as “doing things” is apparently what sci-fi lacks these days thanks to all the WOMEN and QUEERS), and making the galaxy boring because only straight men shooting each other is interesting. At the end everyone sits down to a tea party to talk about their FEEEEELINGS and wear frilly dresses.

Thank you, anonymous yelling douchebag, for clearing that up!


*The SPEARHEAD?! AHAHAHAHAHAHA.

**This is true, actually.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Midna)
Tried to go out birthday shoppin’ with Mom today, but several sneezes, coughing fits, and Kleenexes later she declared me “gross” and took me home.

At least I got to GameStop, though. Man, all of a sudden there are a bunch of great games around!

So I’ve spent the last few days half-heartedly writing a bunch of crap I’ll probably throw out the moment I get my faculties back, watching TNG, drinking lots of tea, reading Tamora Pierce, and playing video games. And the last two have sort of run together so I have decided: I demand a Tortall video game.

You know how the video game companies are trying to target more girls? They’re doing a very bad job of it. They seem to think that, in order to lure girls, they should make games about, you know, Girl Stuff. I say fuck that. If you want to get girls into video games, make ’em a Zelda-style adventure game starring Alanna of Pirate’s Swoop and Olau.

I mean, Tortall is such a perfect setting for games like that. You’ve got character designs all ready to go, and marauding bands of monsters just hanging out waiting to get sworded, and Mystical Crysticals and other such MacGuffins piled up every thirty feet or so, and driving godlike forces. I kinda felt like I was reading an adventure game with Alanna’s series. So why not expand the idea? I can totally see Alanna solving puzzles in a dungeon/temple and then fighting off some GOD DAMN BATS. And she could follow the books, sure, but I'd love a new adventure, while she's off errant doing knight things. Lots more leeway, that.

Granted, video game spinoffs of books don’t seem to be a very big deal—apparently you need to swing by the box office first. And probably it won’t be like in my perfect world,* which would have Tamora Pierce herself writing the story. But hey, I can dream, can’t I?


*A world where everyone gets along, we all accept our differences and love each other for them, a steady supply of raspberry Pim’s cookies remains in the cupboard, MST3k continues with Joel and Mike, Rosetta Stone software is free, pockets and storage bins contain infinitely folded spacetime so you can fit everything you want to in them, and George Lucas died in 1987.
bloodyrosemccoy: (Midna)
AMELIA: I would like to purchase this fine product! *hands cashier tiny Wii*

CASHIER: Now, this is not a real Wii. You realize it is simply a tin to hold gift cards and is in fact $2.99, which is slightly less than even a used Wii costs.

AMELIA: Yes. I am aware of this. Perhaps its size, price, and the way it says “gift card tin” on the package were clues.

CASHIER: Very well. I will ring you up.

I am very glad he didn't ask me what it was for.


Also, dear video game companies: It’s nice that you’re trying to expand your audience to include girls, but I’m beginning to wonder if games like “Imagine You’re a Babysitter” or “Imagine You’re A Fashion Designer” are the right answer to the complaints that there are not enough video games with female protagonists. Just, you know, for the record.

An Insight

Jan. 27th, 2009 11:13 pm
bloodyrosemccoy: (Planets)
Another sign that my science-fiction-writing brain has been destroyed by the internet:

While trying to figure out a culturally-constructed gender role dichotomy for my arhode aliens that was not just some kind of variation on the common human provider/nurturer one,* I realized that the roles I did come up with still fit a dichotomy known to humans.

That’s right, apparently my aliens’ gender roles can be defined in terms of pirate vs. ninja.

I leave you to guess which is male and which is female.


*This is actually rather hard, what with my 23 years of cultural conditioning. I can see why writers default to Crazy Backwards Land where cultural norms dictate men are nurturers and women are providers. At least then you still have your bearings.

Profile

bloodyrosemccoy: (Default)
bloodyrosemccoy

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
678910 1112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 2nd, 2025 04:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios