![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
9 was underwhelming. The art direction was fantastic, and the set design and animation were great, but it was mostly a pretty movie without much else going for it. The characters were stock, the pacing was off, and the plot turned into a shaggy dog story.
There was a lot of buildup, but no payoff. Kudos to them for a cool premise and an attempt to do something unexpected with an old story, but I’m afraid it didn’t give me so much a sense of a hopeful beginning as it did a sense that the writers got through the climax and then got bored trying to think of a conclusion and went bowling instead. “We’ll just say it’s deep!” they assured each other over their delicious bowling feast of pizza and fries. “Nobody can argue with that!”
At least the ham-fisted ending to WALL*E looked like the writers had given it half a second's thought.
Which is a damn shame, because, with a little more thought, the elements the writers put in and then didn’t use could have made for a pretty cool story.
(Also, I decided fairly early on that one of the antagonists was GLaDOS, which suggested an interesting alternate ending …)
There was a lot of buildup, but no payoff. Kudos to them for a cool premise and an attempt to do something unexpected with an old story, but I’m afraid it didn’t give me so much a sense of a hopeful beginning as it did a sense that the writers got through the climax and then got bored trying to think of a conclusion and went bowling instead. “We’ll just say it’s deep!” they assured each other over their delicious bowling feast of pizza and fries. “Nobody can argue with that!”
At least the ham-fisted ending to WALL*E looked like the writers had given it half a second's thought.
Which is a damn shame, because, with a little more thought, the elements the writers put in and then didn’t use could have made for a pretty cool story.
(Also, I decided fairly early on that one of the antagonists was GLaDOS, which suggested an interesting alternate ending …)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 12:12 am (UTC)Maybe once it hits the dollar theaters...
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 01:15 am (UTC)But really, it sort of seems weird that these things would even HAVE sexes. I would have preferred either an all-male or an all-female cast, with an implication that it's just what WE interpret it that way and they're just, y'know, DOLLS.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 01:17 am (UTC)(Okay, unless it's a noun in Spanish, but still.)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 01:26 am (UTC)I have some fun with gender implications in my stories, too--I have a human who, when thinking in English (as versus non-gendered Galactic Common), assigns random pronouns genders to aliens whose gender she doesn't know, or for whom there is no equivalent human gender.* Mostly it's just convenient for me, but it actually is a Plot Point a couple times.
*I do have a bisexual species with male and female gender roles that correspond less with our own usual provider/nurturer roles and more with--I am not making this up--pirate/ninja.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 02:45 am (UTC)I don't think they used any gender-specific pronouns, so it could be thought that 7 is just a particularly feminine doll, without any explicit gender.
Also, since [SPOILER ALERT] the dolls are actually the divided soul of the scientist, who is male, it could be argued she represents his feminine side, which is apparently quite small. But I'm probably overthinking it.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 03:26 am (UTC)And also kind of an amazon, so rock on there Mr. Scientist guy, I guess.
But yeah, my girlfriend totally leaned over and sniggered in my ear "One of his parts is a lady~", though I got an overtly feminine vibe from the twins, too.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 06:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-15 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 12:46 am (UTC)And that is the sound of GLEE from two rows of assorted Information Science students when 3 and 4 appeared and were said to be "cataloging".
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 09:05 pm (UTC)The whole movie was trailer-spotting, actually.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 02:52 am (UTC)Throughout the thing, I kept trying to reason out possible ending plot twists that would make it a better movie. "Okay, clearly the Machine will absorb all the dolls except 9, who will finally give himself up in a Heroic Sacrifice, causing the Machine to develop a complete soul, have a My God What Have I Done moment, and commit suicide, leaving the earth barren and clean." But that didn't happen. Instead they went with an ending that was symbolic but made no logical sense (hey guys? How about putting your buddies' souls back in their bodies? Is that too much trouble?).
Ultimately, it was just a kid's action movie with pretty visuals. On the plus side, it's the first kid's movie I've seen with corpses lying wantonly about the place, so that was kind of edgy. Also, there was the overt drug abuse reference.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 07:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 03:33 am (UTC)This.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 02:55 am (UTC)One of the commentors over on the IMDB said that the Russian language version was rather different than the English language one. Then again, the commentor was Russian and had not seen the English language version and was basing this on what they'd read. So, who knows.
I'd give it a B.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 07:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 09:32 am (UTC)Of course, now I've got some cool ideas for ways to make it WORK, which may bear fruit in some other project, so perhaps it's not TOTALLY pointless ...
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 05:31 am (UTC)Anyone know any neat animated movies where Science Saves the Day? Cos I'd like to see those.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 07:11 am (UTC)Or something.
I will write a memo to my animation-oriented friends to maek some pro-science movies when they get jobs at Pixar.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 08:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 08:54 am (UTC)Got it. :) *is applying for internships at VFX companies*
no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 07:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 09:29 am (UTC)