And Now For Something Completely Different
Nov. 6th, 2008 12:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I coulda swore I made this Fuck You, California! post, but I apparently didn’t actually post it. So here it is now: FUCK YOU, CALIFORNIA.
And you, ARIZONA.
Also you, FLORIDA.
ETA: And we can't forget ARKANSAS.
Still got some work to do, I see. Someday we’ll look back on this and wonder how we ever could have even argued about this shit. I myself don’t understand what the big deal is about marriage—I see it as a strategy for social regulation, and that people get so up-in-arms about how it should be shows that they really don’t understand the big picture. But that we allow some people this and not others for no good reason is terrible.
I would also like to apologize for my state, without whose support Prop 8 would have had a harder time passing. You would think a state founded by people who wanted to try unconventional marriage, a state where many are still sympathetic to people who practice institutionalized incest and statutory rape, would have the grace to shut the hell up. Sorry. I will give Utah a stern talking-to.
We’ll make it. This is a setback, but we’ll make it, dammit.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 07:28 pm (UTC)On the plus side, New York finally has a Democratic majority so this coming term there might be laws allowing same-sex marriage. Last time it was tried, the Republican-controlled State Senate killed the bill by not voting on it in time. We already recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere, which is good as three of our neighbors (two states and Canada) allow it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 07:28 pm (UTC)Plus it may not even have been a legal vote, because amendments to the state constitution like that have to be run through the state legislature... and guess what step was skipped for prop 8?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 08:06 pm (UTC)Funny, how many people think that the rules don't apply to them, when they're trying to make rules for others.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 02:35 am (UTC)There simply isn't a clean division between constitutional and statutory topics in California government.
The No on 8 group's argument is not that the constitution cannot be amended by initiative, but that Prop 8 contradicts more fundamental principles of the California charter to such a degree that it is not a mere amendment, but rather a revision of the constitution, which would require a 2/3 vote of the legislature. Unfortunately, this argument almost never works. Including when they tried to use it to block Prop 8 from getting on the ballot.
So, don't hold your breath.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 07:31 pm (UTC)I just got this great image of you sternly lecturing Utah while wagging your finger. Makes me feel much better.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 12:52 am (UTC)I know he didn't actually SAY "frontier psychiatrist. It was too good to pass up.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 02:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 05:14 am (UTC)On an unrelated note, your icons are mesmerizing, but it might not be healthy for me to stare at them for too long. @_@
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 09:17 pm (UTC)Two dudes/two ladies?: What are you, some kind of sicko?!
FUCK THIS SHIT. >:[