Date: 2014-09-03 03:34 am (UTC)
They seem to be trying harder to have a Victorian/Edwardian nursery fiction style, so the worldbuilding is a bit different, and the tone is pretty cutesy. And the talents get WAY too specific, like I said--Tink is a "pots-and-pans" talent, which isn't so awesome as her mechanical engineer status of the movies. There are a few other characters who aren't in the movies (Rani is kind of interesting), but honestly they seem less developed and likable. (Vidia, for one, is a lot more fun in the films as a passive-aggressive but still likable friend.) And they mention Peter Pan--the films are set before Tink went to hang out with him; the books afterward--and it's rather difficult to add him into the mix. I like it when they're distanced from him. But they're definitely different universes. I'd give the books a pass, but you might want to try them for yourself.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

bloodyrosemccoy: (Default)
bloodyrosemccoy

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
678910 1112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 5th, 2025 02:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios