bloodyrosemccoy (
bloodyrosemccoy) wrote2010-06-13 01:29 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Icon Sez It All
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
ME: Because calling it “Homoerotic Man-Pile” just doesn’t sound quite like what they’re going for.
MOM: And we wonder how come your dad gets depressed when your brother isn’t home.
---
FAMILY: Blah blah blah comments about Shakespeare blah blah.
AMELIA: I just realized something! Shakespeare would mess with grammar and make up words with wild abandon, right? He was the Elizabethan version of Strong Bad!
---
These have been your Deep Thoughts for today. Thank you and good night!
no subject
Homoerotic Man-Pile does sound kinda interesting, though!
no subject
It's really a mutant form of rugby.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Apparently, "foot ball" originally described a whole class of different "peasant" games that were played with balls on foot, as distinguished from games played by aristocrats on horseback. It had nothing to do with any contact the foot and the ball might have had during the game.
One of the quotes from the 1800s describes a game in which kicking the ball is against the rules and calls it "football."
no subject