bloodyrosemccoy: (SCIENCE)
bloodyrosemccoy ([personal profile] bloodyrosemccoy) wrote2009-02-01 09:42 pm

Astronomy!

By the way, if you haven’t seen the Daily Show’s interview with Neil deGrasse Tyson, it’s here and it’s hilarious. You’ve got to love a guy who gets hate mail from third graders.* (They had a bonus follow-up the next day. Apparently the man’s just a bit obsessive about his Rubik’s cubes.)

And as long as we’re on the subject, can someone explain to me why the reclassification of Pluto as a dwarf planet was such a big hairy deal? What I figured was that we found a lot of other Plutos, and it seemed a little ridiculous to keep one as a planet. Was it some sort of emotional attachment? The problem of having to retcon all the Magic Schoolbus-type books and shows? The sudden obsolescence of a poetic mnemonic? Or what?

Anyway, yeah, I’ve been on an astronomy kick lately—to the point where I was wondering if I should learn that instead of ASL interpreting or midwifery or medical technicianing.** Partly it’s because I’ve been worldbuilding again, partly it’s just my own interests. But yeah, I’ve been watching cosmic shows a lot lately.*** I like astronomy a lot—it makes me feel happy all over.

Plus, I get to fangirl awesome people like Neil up there. You know you’re in a good place where you can’t choose your favorite astronomer/astrophysicist because you have entirely too many of them.


*Which makes me wonder if this was a letter-writing campaign from a whole class of third graders, because that suggests to me that Ms. Wiggins or someone heard about Pluto's reclassification and was incensed and stormed into class one day with a bunch of paper and crayons and said, “Class, this bad man is trying to say Pluto isn’t a planet! Let’s write letters to him saying our opinion—which of course is that Pluto is a planet, because I just spent the last three weeks teaching this unit on the solar system, dangit, and I’m not about to start telling you they changed their minds because we had a hard enough time naming the stupid planets and the mnemonic is already memorized!”

**Why yes, I am my own distraction!

***The UFOs and Hitler History Channel show I’m Netflixing, by the way, still has some totally hilarious analogies. Highlights from the second disc include “The moon is like a child playing ring-around-the-rosy” (one side always faces inward as it circles Earth), “Venus is Earth’s evil twin,” and “The Earth is like a Porsche.” I could not figure out what was up with that last analogy, but I think the documentary producers really liked it and told all their interviewees to explain how the Earth is like a Porsche. It was highly entertaining to watch them struggle to come up with reasons.
beccastareyes: Image of two women (Utena and Anthy) dancing with stars in the background.  Text: I have loved the stars too fondly... (stars)

[personal profile] beccastareyes 2009-02-02 02:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Even astronomers care about it. Well, a few. Back when the announcement came out, Dr. M-, our (former) Kuiper Belt/small objects/Mercury guy posted it to the elevator. Dr. B-, one of our Martians, then put up a 'Save Pluto' bumper sticker on his bulletin board. Dr. M- responded by making a 'Save Pallas' bumper sticker for his door. (We also suspect that Dr. M- was behind a special DPS session this year in which a bunch of people talked about why it was okay for Pluto to be a dwarf planet. We had been hoping that there would be a fight between Dr. M- and either Dr. B- or a Kuiper Belt person that disagreed.)

As for me, I tend to agree with Dr. S-, the other Martian, who said that Pluto does not care what we call it. I also think that it reflects the trends in planetary science -- if you are a dynamicist (you study how stuff moves), or work on the system as a whole, you're more likely to want to keep the Big Eight and put Pluto with all the other debris out there. If you're a planetary geologist, you want to study anything that's round (planets, dwarf planets, large moons) as geologically interesting, and tend to focus a bit more. (Somewhat -- there's not enough data to really focus on any single thing except Mars. If you like 'small things with ice', you hop to whatever place has a NASA probe there.)

(I don't know why I'm abbreviating the names -- five minutes on Google could tell you who I mean, and I give enough hints that even not knowing where I go to grad school would just add a couple of spots to your search.)