ext_13386 ([identity profile] gryphart.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] bloodyrosemccoy 2011-01-17 08:27 am (UTC)

The cynic in me opines that publishers are doing their best to phase out everything but photomanipulated/stock photo covers regardless of content, as that way they can usually do it all in-house and/or keep cover costs cheaper.

(I also generally think that photo covers for fiction are unappealing and should get off my lawn, dagnabit, but alas, the pendulum is heading way the other direction.)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting