bloodyrosemccoy (
bloodyrosemccoy) wrote2010-06-24 07:58 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Speaking Of Living On The Internet ...
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I probably still won’t be very timely with my comments, but I’ve been trying to keep up, especially with my core group of friends on here, because quite a lot of you are FRIENDS, and not just in the online Hey-We-Both-Like-Cake-And-Have-Blogs-We-Are-Now-Friends sense. I’d rather not lose that, so unless I get hit by a truck or something, I assure you I’ll definitely be sticking around.
no subject
I'm thinking of taking a few of my larger comms off my default view, and go read them manually, because yeah. I can go two pages and not see anything by specific people, and it's easy to skim by things. :/
(no subject)
no subject
*hikikomori*
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
And like
I'm just too damned verbose for that kind of limitation.
My biggest hurdle these days is finding time to post meaningful posts. Work ties up so much of my time now. And while I've added a couple comms that eat into my available time frame, there's a ready built "Journals Only" filter that I use when I just want to catch up.
I find that people who actually leave LJ end up not getting read as regulalry. Perhaps I'm just old, but it's difficult to find the time to go search out my friends who have left for their own blogs elsewhere. But that's just convenience. There's a bit of an emotional response when people move elsewhere too, and it's even worse when they're NOT bloggers with massive followings like Ursula. It seems more personal somehow.
And the exodus has been long and estensive. There are times when my friend's list lacks updates from so many people who used to post regularly. It starts to feel like a desert here- like I'm one of the last few luddites who hasn't moved on to The Next Big Thing, but frankly, LJ suits me way too well to consider a massive shift in both style and substance.
I'm glad you're going to be around. I would miss you a lot if you left.
(no subject)
no subject
FWIW I've always been more active in people's comments than on my own LJ. Actually, I first got an account just so I'd have a username in comments rather than being anonymous, and only started posting for myself much later. I got the permaccount so I'd have lots of icons for scans_daily, which kinda backfired when SD got the boot.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Man was it ever.
I'm cross-posting a lot from DW, but I've noticed that for anything that means something personally, its home is on LJ. I just don't "reach for DW first," you know? This is where my home base is, because those relationships don't just disappear.
I found myself trying to explain this (on Twitter, no less. To Posterous.) today. I have 8 years of life here. I was just a kid in college when I started this blog. Now I'm 30 and that's a lot of change to deal with -- and I've dealt with it all here. Cancer, my dad's death, the birth of my nephew (and later, my niece), my brother getting married -- all kinds of great and horrible things, all here. All part of me. And my flist has been there (growing and waning in turn, but always there and always with constants) through it all.
I had everything unlocked when I first began. Then came the time of filtering. The the friends only years with heavy filtering.... and now back to a time of openness with rare filtering. It's like the changes of a society -- I'm my own microcosm!
Or something.
Anyway, no matter how much I enjoy DW and how useful I find Posterous and how much fun I think Twitter can be for 2 second tweets from work, LJ is home. It's where I live. It's how my best friend and I kept in touch while she lived in Dallas and I lived in Memphis or how we met some of our now good friends. It cultivates friendships and helps us stay connected. Whatever corporate is doing, that's kind of worth more.
Sorry to totally threadjack, but it just makes me think.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)