bloodyrosemccoy: (Languages)
bloodyrosemccoy ([personal profile] bloodyrosemccoy) wrote2010-03-12 03:52 am

Perspective On Conlangs!

A tl;dr Q&A in the NY Times about conlangs

Not a very satisfactory “panel” there—Okrent’s not a conlanger but a sort of outside ethnographer, and Frommer’s a little tangled up in Na’vi right now. It’s most interesting to me as a sort of snapshot of how folks who never thought much about conlanging approach it.* I kind of like reminding myself that not everyone takes for granted the things I do.


*In a lot of cases, with an almost entertaining veiled hostility. Count how many of the questions subtly note that there are a lot of better ways a conlanger could be spending their time! It’s made me decide to start asking vaguely insulting questions about hobbies I don’t share! “Couldn’t you spend that time you use playing football to volunteer at a soup kitchen?” “Don’t you have enough quilts by now? Why make more?”** “Who’s going to look at this sketchbook, anyway?”

**Actually, somebody asked my mom this.

[identity profile] rikchik.livejournal.com 2010-03-12 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)
When I see comments like that I wonder how much time the complainer spends watching TV.

[identity profile] padparadscha.livejournal.com 2010-03-13 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Hee hee! I do, too. If you have ever sat on your ass for four hours watching shows like The Biggest Loser and Ace of Cakes, you are not allowed to tell me that working out syntactical relationships between words is a waste of my precious time.

Granted, even Reading A Good Book--which people seem to think is a virtuous thing to do--doesn't really have a measurably productive impact on society. It's kind of fascinating to try to figure out what "wasting time" really means. Seems arbitrary to me.