bloodyrosemccoy: (Headpiano)
bloodyrosemccoy ([personal profile] bloodyrosemccoy) wrote2010-03-12 12:31 am

AGAIN?

Dammit, there has got to be at least one speculative fiction novel out there that doesn’t introduce a female protagonist by RAPING HER.

It’s not so much that I disapprove of it happening in a story—stories are great because all sorts of totally awful things can happen to pretend people, instead of to real people, and I could write a whole dissertation on this. All I'm sayin' is, when it becomes the default way to introduce someone, I … get a little unsettled.

This book is pretty damn good anyway, and it does look like the incident serves some purpose of character and/or story development, but I'm starting to regard authors with suspicion when they open this way. Good grief.

[identity profile] gethenian.livejournal.com 2010-03-12 09:35 am (UTC)(link)
I think the real "problem" is that you are attracted to and entertained by a certain "type" of story or character which has a high tendency to come packaged with the elements you DON'T like. That really usually happens because they are memeplexes, and/or holons, which are passed down among storytellers and all aspects of them get written because deviating from the memeplex or holon is a risk too big for most sci-fi authors to be willing or driven to take, because most authors do not make enough money from their books to be able to support themselves and their families on their writing alone... and because it is actually against our instinctive nature to do so.

It's weird how this works, but it's pretty common. I would be willing to guess that not one of those books of yours would be anything I'd be even willing to START reading. And that's why it's common -- because you read what you WANT to read, and what you WANT to read tends to come with baggage you DON'T want to read.

I don't know... if it bothers you that much, maybe try picking up a book yo DON'T immediately want to read? Ask for suggestions from other people and find some books with what you like and less of what you don't? I can't help you, sadly, but that might be a start...

[identity profile] padparadscha.livejournal.com 2010-03-12 10:02 am (UTC)(link)
... Not sure I understood all that.

Normally my book-choosing algorithm is pretty good; spec fic is a broad genre, what with the whole idea of "speculation." It's just that some authors have enough imagination to pull it off, and some don't. (Also, some authors are misogynistic douchebags.) You can't always tell from the book jacket, so you've got to open the book and find out for yourself. And for some reason, a lot of the lousy authors in any genre (and a few of the good ones) like to fling that trope around because it's GRITTY or TITILLATING without being part of the story. That's the frustrating part.